CSM Bridge Design AASHTO - Superpositioning#
Description#
The task CSM Bridge Design AASHTO - Superpositioning supports the input of combinations of transient actions acc. Table 3.4.1-1 AASHTO - 2014 in a tabular way.
The following combinations can be considered, with the number and the name of the limit state being fixed:
Number |
Limit State |
Description |
---|---|---|
1 |
STRENGTH I |
Basic combination relating to the normal vehicular use of the bridge without wind. |
2 |
STRENGTH II |
Load combination relating to the use of the bridge by Owner-specified special design vehicles, evaluation permit vehicles, or both, without wind. |
3 |
STRENGTH III |
Load combination relating to the bridge exposed to wind velocities exceeding 55 mph. |
4 |
STRENGTH IV |
Load combination relating to very high dead load to live load force effect ratios in bridge superstructures. |
5 |
STRENGTH V |
Load combination relating to normal vehicular use of the bridge with wind of 55 mph velocity. |
11 |
SERVICE I |
Load combination relating to normal operational use of the bridge with a 55 mph wind and all loads taken at their nominal values. Also relating to deflection control in burried metal structures, tunnel liner plate and thermoplastic pipe, to control crack width in reinforced concrete structures, and for transverse analysis relating to tension in concrete segmental girders. This combination should also be used for investigation of slope stability. |
12 |
SERVICE II |
Load combination intended to control yielding of steel structures and slip of slip-critical connections due to vehicular live load. |
13 |
SERVICE III |
Load combination for longitudinal analysis relating to tension in prestressed concrete superstructures, with the objective of crack control and principal tension in the webs of segmental concrete girders. |
14 |
SERVICE IV |
Load combination relating only to tension in prestressed concrete columns with the objective of crack control. |
Larger of the two load factors for action TU (force effect due to uniform temperature) acc. Table 3.4.1-1 needs to be taken into account when checking the deformations. Therefore, for each combination from the previous table an analogue type is available:
Number |
Limit State |
Number |
Limit State |
---|---|---|---|
6 |
STRE_DEFO I |
15 |
SERV_DEFO I |
7 |
STRE_DEFO II |
16 |
SERV_DEFO II |
8 |
STRE_DEFO III |
17 |
SERV_DEFO III |
9 |
STRE_DEFO IV |
18 |
SERV_DEFO IV |
10 |
STRE_DEFO V |
The following transient actions are supported by the task:
Action |
Description |
Action |
Description |
---|---|---|---|
BL |
Blast loading |
LL |
Vehicular live load |
BR |
Blast loading |
LS |
Live load surcharge |
CE |
Vehicular centrifugal force |
PL |
Pedestrian live load |
CT |
Vehicular collision force |
SE |
Force effect due to settlement |
CV |
Vessel collision force |
TG |
Force effect due to temperature gradient |
EQ |
Earthquake load |
TU |
Force effect due to uniform temperature |
FR |
Friction load |
WA |
Water load and stream pressure |
IC |
Ice load |
WL |
Wind on live load |
IM |
Vehicular dynamic load allowance |
WS |
Wind load on structure |
Note
Each cell in the task’s columns “Action 1-10” contains a drop-down list of the allowed actions. The list will only show actions, which loadcases have been previously calculated.
Additionally, Combinations 4 and 9, i.e. STRENGTH IV and STRE-DEFO IV, require a modified value of the safety factor for the dead load of structural components and nonstructural attachments. Therefore, the allowed list of actions for these two combinations also includes the actions D_1 and D_2, i.e. structural dead load and nonstructural components, and only if the corresponding load cases have been previously calculated (usually with CSM Construction Manager).